arXiv paper: Do You Really Need to Pretrain Q-Functions for Online RL Fine-Tuning?

arXiv ID: 2607.27203v1 Title: Do You Really Need to Pretrain Q-Functions for Online RL Fine-Tuning? Authors: Perry Dong, Ron Polonsky, Dorsa Sadigh, Chelsea Fin Primary category: cs.LG Categories: cs.LG Published: 2026-07-29T17:59:51Z Updated: 2026-07-29T17:59:51Z Abstract: Pre-training followed by fine-tuning has become the dominant recipe for learning performant policies, and in value-based reinforcement learning (RL) this raises a natural question: given a pretrained policy, should the Q-function be pretrained on offline data too? Conventional wisdom suggests it should, but recent results show that online RL with a randomly-initialized Q-function can result in highly performant and reliable policies without needing to pretrain the Q-function. In this paper, we systematically study whether pretraining the Q-function actually helps when fine-tuning on top of a pretrained base policy. We find, surprisingly, that naive Q-function pretraining often provides little benefit over random initialization. We show this stems from a fundamental mismatch: the Q-function learned during pretraining targets the pretrained policy's Q-function, not the Q-function that online fine-tuning converges to, and this gap persists even after offline value maximization. Motivated by this finding, we propose Initialization via Policy Ensemble (IPE), a simple method that trains multiple diverse policies and uses their pooled rollouts to bootstrap the Q-function learning in online RL. Across a suite of challenging continuous control benchmarks, IPE yields an average 1.26x improvement in fine-tuning performance over naive Q-function pre-training. PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.27203v1